David de Burgh Graham - d'ici pour ici
Candidat à l'investiture libérale de Laurentides--Labelle // Candidate for the Liberal nomination in Laurentides--Labelle
Pour quoi nous luttons
What we are fighting for
Bon nombre d'entre vous m'ont demandé pourquoi je souhaitais être votre député fédéral, avec tous les risques attachés à cette décision, alors que j'exerce déjà une carrière stable et remplie de succès au parlement.
Une bonne et simple raison est que j'ai vu comment les bons députés représentaient les besoins de leurs électeurs à Ottawa, et je crois ceux de nos communautés dans Laurentides--Labelle n'ont pas été adéquatement défendus depuis bien longtemps.
La première tâche d'un député est d'être votre défenseur au sein du gouvernement fédéral et de vous aider à naviguer à travers sa bureaucratie pour résoudre des problématiques individuelles ou partagées par l'ensemble du comté. En cas de problème, votre député doit être là pour vous aider sans égard à vos convictions politiques.
Il y aussi plusieurs autres tâches qu'un député doit accomplir. Plusieurs d'entre eux semblent penser que leur rôle consiste à représenter leur parti politique ou le gouvernement dans leur communauté. Ils annoncent des subventions gouvernementales ou des prises de positions partisanes qui sont souvent déconnectées des préoccupations et des priorités du comté.
Ce n'est cependant pas le rôle d'un représentant élu. La responsabilité d'un député est de promouvoir vos idées et partager vos préoccupations pour trouver des solutions avec les acteurs de notre communauté et les autres élus du pays. Le Parlement doit suggérer des solutions, et le travail de votre député est de travailler de concert avec vous pour faciliter leur application.
Ensemble, au sein du Parlement, les députés de l'ensemble du pays doivent se servir des idées de leurs communautés respectives et des réactions de leurs citoyens pour guider l'ensemble du Canada vers la voie choisie par le peuple. Une idéologie rigide et des idées tranchées n'ont que peu de place dans ce processus. Nous devons rassembler les gens, partager leurs idées et innover pour faire mieux.
Dans cette course, je souhaite aider notre communauté, ma communauté, parce qu'ensemble, nous pouvons faire mieux.
Je vous remercie d'avoir l'avenir de notre communauté à coeur, et je vous invite à vous joindre à moi pour mettre en application cette vision.
David de B Graham,
d'ici pour ici
Candidat à l'investiture dans Laurentides--Labelle
A number of you have asked me why I want to be your Member of Parliament, with the risks and stresses associated with the role, when I already have a stable and successful career in Parliament.
I have seen the way good Members of Parliament represent constituents' needs in Ottawa and I feel the needs of our communities in Laurentides--Labelle have not been properly defended for a very long time.
The first job of an MP is to be your advocate within the federal government, someone to help navigate the bureaucracy and resolve problems for individuals and for community organisations inside the riding. When you have a problem, your MP is there to help, regardless of your personal convictions.
But there is more to the job than that. Many MPs seem to believe their role is to represent the political party, or the government, to the community. They announce spending initiatives or the policy positions of their leaders that are often disconnected from the concerns and priorities of the riding.
That is not the role of a representative. An MP's responsibility is to promote your ideas and share your concerns so as to find solutions by working with the representatives of other communities across the country. Parliament must be about solutions and an MP's role is to work with you to find and facilitate them.
A rigid ideology has little place in this process. We must bring people together, share their ideas and find ways of doing better.
In this race I want to help our community, my home, bring our ideas together. Because, together, we can do better.
Thank you for taking the future of our community to heart; let's work together to achieve this vision.
David de B Graham,
from here, for here
Liberal nomination candidate in Laurentides--Labelle
words - Posted at 12:34 on
August 03, 2014
|Ensemble, nous pouvons mieux faire||Together we can do better|
Je vous remercie pour vos réactions très positives que vous m.avez envoyées alors que la course à l'investiture de Laurentides--Labelle avance. Le Parti libéral du Canada m'a donné le « feu vert », ce qui veut dire qu'il ne reste que le vote à l'investiture, pour lequel une date n'a pas encore été déterminée.
À l'âge de 32 ans, je suis le plus jeune des candidats dans cette course et je perçois mon travail comme étant un investissement à long terme dans ma communauté. Bien que notre esprit soit fort, notre région n'est pas des plus économiquement riches. En fait, Laurentides--Labelle est l'une des plus pauvres circonscriptions au pays. Un manque d'intérêt du gouvernement fédéral au cours des dernières décennies se traduit par un manque d'investissement dans des endroits clés, de l'infrastructure à l'éducation. Les services de poste se voient être coupés partout à travers les régions rurales et les petits centre urbains, les services d'internet sont loin d'être fiables et universels, le réseau routier traine de la patte en comparaison à la croissance de la population et de l'industrie du tourisme. Il y a un manque d'écoles de métiers et autres institutions post-secondaires. Un grand nombre de nos jeunes partent pour continuer leurs études et ne reviennent simplement pas.
En plus que son riche histoire, notre région est reconnue pour ses anciennes montagnes, lacs et forêts. Un savoir local est important pour prendre de bonnes décisions. Sans ce savoir, nous nous trouvons dans des situations comme celle du Mont Kaaikop. Une des rares forêts vierges ayant survécu le développement d'agriculture, elle mérite d'être protégée. Toutefois, la communauté où je suis né, Sainte-Lucie, se bat depuis de nombreuses années pour la sauver contre ceux qui voudraient la faire couper.
Je crois que nous pouvons, devons, et, ensemble, ferons mieux. Chaque niveau de gouvernement a ses responsabilités, mais ils ont également une chose en commun : nous. La coopération entre les différents paliers de gouvernements est essentielle à notre succès.
Le vote à l'investiture est le premier pas à l'élection fédérale de 2015. Seuls les membres du partis, des gens comme vous, peuvent y voter pour choisir le prochain candidat libéral. Si vous voulez voir la promotion de nos valeurs partagées lors de l'élection, il y a trois choses que vous pouvez faire pour aider :
Thank you for the very positive feedback you have been sending as the nomination race here in Laurentides--Labelle heats up. The Liberal Party of Canada has given me the "green light", clearing the last hurdle before the nomination vote, which has yet to be scheduled.
At 32, I am the youngest candidate in this race and I see my work as a long-term investment in my community. Though our community spirit is strong, our region is not one of great wealth. Indeed, Laurentides--Labelle is among the poorest ridings in the country. Disengagement from the Federal government in past decades means it is one that is lacking in key areas from infrastructure to education. Postal service is being squeezed by the Conservative government all across rural and small-town Canada, Internet service is still far from either universal or reliable, the road network has lagged given the population growth and the expansion of the tourism industry. There is a shortage of trade schools and other post-secondary education, and of opportunity for our young people. A lot of our youth move away to pursue education and careers, and a large portion of them simply don't return.
As well as its rich human history, this is a region known for its ancient mountains, forests, and lakes. Having local knowledge is important to help make good decisions, lest we end up with unfortunate situations like Mont Kaaikop, one of the most pristine parts of the Laurentians. It is one of the few remaining virgin growth forests to survive the agricultural period, yet my home town of Sainte-Lucie has spent tens of thousands of dollars over the last few years fighting to protect it from being cut.
I believe that we can, we should, and, together, we shall do better. The federal, provincial, and municipal governments each have responsibilities and jurisdictions, but they each have one thing in common: us. Cooperation and interaction among the levels is essential to our success.
However, the first step in the process is the nomination, where it is only the party members, people like you, who choose the candidate who will wear the party colours in next year's election. If you want our shared values to make it onto the ballot, there are three things you can do:
1. Joignez-vous à notre équipe de bénévoles qui travaillent sur le sol pour partager notre message dans les 43 municipalités de notre circonscription. Il y a de nombreuses différentes façons que vous pouvez aider, peu importe le montant de temps disponible que vous avez à offrir. Vous n'avez qu'à me contacter et nous discuterons de la meilleure façon que vous pouvez aider dans votre communauté.
2. Si vous n'êtes pas encore membre du Parti libéral du Canada, vous pouvez nous joindre et encourager vos amis et voisins à faire de même. Vous pouvez le faire en ligne ici : www.liberal.ca/fr/adhesion/ ou simplement me laisser savoir et j'irai vous rencontrer en personne.
3. Vous pouvez faire un don, soit par transfert Interac par courriel au firstname.lastname@example.org, ou par l'entremise d'un chèque personnel au montant maximal de 1 200 dollars*, au nom de "Margaret Ann Stafford, Agente financière". Contactez-nous et nous irons le ramasser, ou vous pouvez l'envoyer par la poste à l'adresse suivante :
Campagne à l'investiture de David Graham
1494 ch du 6e Rang
Ste-Lucie-des-Laurentides (QC) J0T 2J0
Ensemble, nous pouvons mieux faire.
David de B Graham, d'ici pour ici
Candidat à l'investiture de Laurentides--Labelle
* Veuillez noter que ces dons ne sont pas déductibles d.impôt et les chèques corporatifs de sont pas acceptés, et que seul les citoyens ou résidants Canadiens peuvent donner. Si vous avez déjà donné à une association locale ou une autre campagne à l'investiture ailleurs au pays en 2014, vous devez déduire ce montant du maximum. Pour toutes questions, n'hésitez pas de me contacter.
1. Join our team of volunteers working on the ground to get our message out across the 43 towns of our riding. There are many different ways you can volunteer whatever amount of time you have. Just contact me and we can discuss how you can best help in your community.
2. If you aren.t yet a member of the Liberal Party of Canada, you can sign-up and encourage your friends and neighbours to do the same. You can do so online here: www.liberal.ca/membership/ or, you can let me know and I will be happy to come out and meet you in person.
3. You can donate. Use Interac email transfer to send a donation to email@example.com, or write a personal cheque up to a maximum of $1,200* to "Margaret Ann Stafford, Financial Agent" and let me know, so we can come pick it up, or you may mail it to:
David Graham nomination campaign
1494 ch du 6e Rang
Ste-Lucie-des-Laurentides (QC) J0T 2J0
Together, we can do better.
David de B Graham, from here, for here
Qualified Liberal nomination candidate in Laurentides--Labelle
* Please note that these donations are not tax deductible and corporate cheques cannot be accepted; only citizens or residents of Canada may donate. If you have already donated to a riding association or to another nomination campaign anywhere in Canada in 2014, you must deduct that amount from the maximum you can give. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to get back to me.
words - Posted at 11:33 on
June 25, 2014
|Travaillons ensemble||Let's work together|
Je suis impliqué avec le Parti libéral du Canada depuis de nombreuses années, car je crois que c'est la meilleure avenue pour améliorer la direction dans laquelle se dirige notre pays.
Je suis idéaliste, mais je suis également au courant des problèmes auxquels nous faisons face. Les Conservateurs de Stephen Harper en ont fait beaucoup pour nous dégoûter de la politique et des politiciens. Ils espèrent que cette stratégie découragera le public de s'engager dans le processus démocratique et promouvra le cynisme.
De l'autre côté, le Parti libéral met en place un plan qui trouve son fondement dans l'opinion et le savoir des gens comme vous et moi, qui cherchent à servir l'intérêt de nos communautés et notre pays, et qui n'est pas calqué d'une idéologie simpliste et rigide, comme le font les Conservateurs.
L'idée d'un défi ne m'a jamais arrêté et, après mes nombreuses années sur la Colline parlementaire, j'ai une bonne idée de ce qui nous attend. Comme plusieurs parmi vous le savent déjà, suite à une longue réflexion, j'ai conclu que je pouvais mettre ces années d'expérience au profit de nos communautés et de notre pays en me présentant comme candidat à l'investiture libérale dans notre circonscription de Laurentides--Labelle. Mes ancêtres se sont installé dans la région il y a presqu'un siècle, et ça continue avec la récente naissance à Ste-Agathe de ma fille Ozara, et je comprends les dossiers importants qui nous touchent tous. Toutefois, votre opinion, vos suggestions et vos commentaires m'aideront envers l'accomplissement de nos objectifs communs.
J'ai regardé avec beaucoup d'intérêt les résultats de l'élection provinciale et je respecte profondément l'électorat et leur décision. Au cours des prochains mois, je vous garderez au courant de mon progrès pour devenir le candidat officiel du Parti libéral du Canada dans notre circonscription de Laurentides--Labelle.
J'ai bien hâte de travailler avec vous.
David de B Graham
For years, I have been involved with the Liberal Party of Canada and I believe it is the best avenue to get Canada back on track.
Idealistic but not naïve, I am aware of the problems we face. The Harper Conservatives have gone to great lengths to make us profoundly sick of politics and politicians. Their strategy is specifically focused on disengaging the public from the process, discouraging participation, and promoting cynicism.
The Liberal Party, on the other hand, will put forth a strong plan for the country based on the input of people like you and me who work together to seek what is in the best interests of our community and our country, rather than restricting ourselves to a rigid ideology, like that of the current government.
I have never been one to shy away from a challenge. Having worked in politics in some form for most of my life, and on Parliament Hill for the past few years, I have a reasonably good sense of the challenges ahead. As some of you already know, I have put a lot of thought into how I can make a meaningful difference and have concluded that I can best put my years of experience to the benefit of our communities by seeking the nomination for the Liberal Party in our riding. I have deep roots here going back nearly a century, a legacy continued with the recent birth of my daughter Ozara in Ste-Agathe, and I understand the major issues at play, but your input, questions and comments will help me as I work towards our shared goals.
I have observed with great interest the results of the provincial election and I deeply respect the electorate and their decision. Over the next months, I will update you on my progress as I work to become the official candidate for the federal Liberal Party for our riding of Laurentides--Labelle.
I am looking forward to working with you.
David de B Graham
words - Posted at 17:14 on
April 13, 2014
|Je vous présente||Presenting|
Ozara Marcelino Graham à fait son début hier à l?Hôpital Laurentien de Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts. Elle pèse 5 livres 11 onces. Maman et bébé vont très bien et Ozara est fougueuse et prêt à prendre le monde en main.
- David, Mishiel et Ozara
Ozara Marcelino Graham arrived yesterday at the Laurentian Hospital in Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts. She weighed in at 5 lb 11 ounces. Mother and daughter are both doing very well and Ozara is all feisty and ready to take on the world.
- David, Mishiel and Ozara
words - Posted at 08:31 on
March 20, 2014
Scott Simms, député, visite Laurentides--Labelle
Scott Simms, MP, visits Laurentides--Labelle
Sainte-Lucie-des-Laurentides -- le 28 février 2014 -- Le dimanche 23 février, David Graham, qui se présente à l'investiture du Parti libéral du Canada dans Laurentides--Labelle, a participé à un café-causerie à Ste-Lucie.
Une vingtaine de personnes sont venues pour entendre de Scott Simms, député fédéral de Bonavista--Gander--Grand Falls--Windsor et démontrer leur soutien à la candidature de David Graham.
Ce café-causerie est venu suite au Congrès biennal du Parti libéral du Canada, qui a eu lieu à Montréal et fût un énorme succès.
David croit fortement dans l'avenir de sa région, ainsi qu'en l'idée qu'il peut pratiquer la politique de manière positive et différente.
D'autres café-causeries suivront dans toute la région des Laurentides au cours des prochaines semaines et des prochains mois, et David a bien hâte de continuer à rencontrer plus de gens pour qui cette région est leur chez-soi.
David peut être trouvé à travers sa page Facebook au facebook.com/daviddebgraham
Ste-Lucie-des-Laurentides -- February 28, 2014 -- On Sunday, February 23rd, David Graham, who is seeking the nomination for the Liberal Party of Canada, attended a meet and greet in Ste-Lucie.
Approximately twenty people attended to hear from Scott Simms, MP for Bonavista--Gander--Grand Falls--Windsor, and to show their support for David Graham's candidacy.
This meet and greet took place following the resoundingly successful Liberal Party of Canada's biennial Convention in Montreal.
David believes strongly in the future of his home, the Laurentians, as well as in his vision that politics can be positive and done differently.
Other meet and greets will follow over the next few weeks and months across the Laurentians and David is looking forward to continuing to meet all of the people who call this area home.
David can be reached through his Facebook page facebook.com/daviddebgraham
words - Posted at 21:28 on
February 28, 2014
David Graham annonce sa candidature à l'investiture libérale de Laurentides--Labelle
David Graham announces his candidacy for the Liberal nomination in Laurentides--Labelle
Sainte-Lucie-des-Laurentides -- le 27 janvier 2014 -- Hier soir, David Graham a annoncé publique sa candidature pour l'investiture du Parti libéral du Canada dans la circonscription de Laurentides--Labelle.
"Je suis heureux de confirmer mon intention de devenir le candidat libéral dans Laurentides--Labelle, là où j'ai grandi et que j'appelle toujours chez moi", a-t-il dit. "C'est un honneur pour moi d'avoir l'opportunité d'approcher mes voisins et aider à participer à l'amélioration de nos communautés".
David Graham, né à Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts en 1981 et ayant grandi à Sainte-Lucie, est fils de Joseph Graham & Sheila Eskenazi. Il travaille présentement pour le député libéral Scott Simms et continue de voyager au travers des Laurentides à toutes les semaines, rencontrant un grand nombre de personnes à travers de nombreuses communautés. Il est impliqué en politique avec le Parti libéral du Canada depuis plusieurs années, ayant également fait partie de l'équipe de données de la campagne à la Chefferie de Justin Trudeau.
"Je suis des Laurentides et fier d'y être", a-t-il ajouté. "C'est pourquoi on a pu me voir à des évènements comme le Festival de bateaux-dragon pour la fondation médicale des Laurentides ou en conduisant pour l'Opération Nez Rouge de Mont-Tremblant, et pourquoi j'aime faire le ski de fond dans la forêt chez-nous ou me promener sur le parc linéaire le p'tit train du nord. Il n'y a pas de meilleur sentiment qu'être chez-soi avec les gens qu'on aime et qu'on apprécie. Les gens des Laurentides travaillent fort et j'adore passer du temps avec celles et ceux aux côtés de qui j'ai grandi. J'ai hâte d'avoir l'opportunité de représenter les intérêts du peuple laurentien à la Chambre des communes."
Laurentides--Labelle est la circonscription fédérale allant de Sainte-Anne-des-Lacs au sud, jusqu'au nord de Sainte-Anne-du-Lac et jusqu'à Notre-Dame-du-Laus à l'ouest. La date de l'investiture n'a pas encore été confirmée par le Parti libéral, mais aura lieu avant l'élection fédérale, présentement planifiée pour le 19 Octobre 2015. Vous pouvez visiter la page Facebook de David au www.facebook.com/daviddebgraham.
Ste-Lucie-des-Laurentides -- January 27, 2014 -- Last night, David Graham announced his candidacy for the federal Liberal nomination in the riding of Laurentides--Labelle.
"I am happy to confirm my intention to become the Liberal candidate in Laurentides--Labelle, where I grew up and where I still call home," he said. "It's an honour for me to have the opportunity to meet with my neighbours and participate in the improvement of our communities."
David Graham, the son of Sheila Eskenazi and Joseph Graham, was born in Ste-Agathe-des-Monts in 1981 and grew up in Ste-Lucie. He currently works for Liberal MP Scott Simms and continues to travel the Laurentians every week, meeting a large number of people across many communities. He has been involved with the Liberal Party for many years, and recently served on the data team for Justin Trudeau's leadership campaign.
"I am proud to be from the Laurentians," he added. "It's why you can find me at events like the Laurentian Medical Foundation's Dragon Boat festival or driving for Operation Red Nose in Mont-Tremblant, and why I love skiing in the woods at home or exploring the linear park. There's no better feeling than being at home with the people we love and appreciate. The people of the Laurentians work hard and I enjoy spending time with the people I grew up with. I look forward to the opportunity to be able to take the concerns of the residents of the Laurentians to the floor of the House of Commons."
Laurentides--Labelle is the federal riding stretching from Ste-Anne-des-Lacs in the south to north of Ste-Anne-du-Lac to Notre-Dame-du-Laus in the west. The date of the nomination has not yet been announced by the Liberal Party but will take place before the next federal election, currently scheduled for October 19th, 2015. You can view David's facebook page at www.facebook.com/daviddebgraham.
words - Posted at 15:18 on
January 27, 2014
Non-motorised boat rally in Lac-des-Sables
Ste-Agathe-des-Monts, Quebec, has one of the most popular lakes to swim and boat in in the Laurentians. Lac-des-Sables, a letter-H shaped lake with large peninsulas defining several discrete bays.
The lake has several islands, numerous cottages, several public beaches, a sailing school that I attended for a couple of summers where I learned how to sail the floating bathtubs appropriately named "optimists", and is host to the Alouette tour-boats, at least one private helicopter, and several float planes. It is a diverse and very busy lake.
Between the sea-doos, motorboats, planes, tourboats, and water-skiers is another whole class of boat: the non-motorised boat. Pedalos, kayaks, sailboats, canoes, surfboards, and miscellaneous other boats ply these waters all summer long, including the narrow channel at the end of Presqu'ile Nantel. To remind the motorboats of their quieter peers, Ste-Agathe started hosting an annual event called the "non-motorised boat rally" in 2012. This year, my father and I took the canoe, mounted it comically on the roof of the car, and took it into Ste-Agathe to participate in this event.
Along with two 12-seat canoes, several kayaks, standard canoes, rowboats, and sailboats, the two hour event saw us all paddling in aimless circles stopping to chat and making our presence felt among the other boats in the lake.
The event was an excellent reminder to all about both the joy of boating and the need to share navigable waters.
Even if the Conservative government does not believe this lake deserves environmental protection, leading communities like Ste-Agathe do take the protection of our water seriously and a cleaning certificate and permit is required for any boat entering the water.
words - Posted at 23:31 on
July 07, 2013
Letter: Quebec has always been, and will always be, home
On St-Jean-Baptiste, Montrealer Harley Kesselman wrote a Letter to the Editor in the Montreal Gazette deriding Quebec as a place with a "backwards government and society with the highest taxes on the continent" and announce he was leaving for Florida, a state which has since banned all computers and smartphones, among other such carefully considered laws as requiring Canadians to have an International Driver's License to drive in the state.
I felt the letter was a little bit unfair to a province I jumped at the opportunity to return to a few years ago because I find it to be one of the most progressive and forward-thinking jurisdictions around. The letter prompted me to write a response, which was published in the Gazette on June 27th.
Re: "I'm tired of the problems; my future is not in Quebec" (Letter of the day, March 4) and "Au revoir, Quebec -- et bonne chance" (Opinion, June 24)
As an anglophone of Jewish heritage living in Quebec, I have asked myself: what does being a Quebecer really mean? I have come to a different conclusion from Harley Kesselman, as I, like many others, believe that you can be a proud Quebecer while wanting to take an active part in helping improve our society.
I grew up in Ste-Lucie-des-Laurentides, not far from Ste-Agathe. It is not exactly an urban metropolis, nor the centre of the Canadian anglophone or Jewish communities. In French school, I received taunts of tête carrée, among others, had a baseball thrown squarely at my nose, and endured what many other children endure in school every day.
Although hurtful at the time, it only helped to build my own character. In fact, it made me prouder of the fact that, by the time I was 14 and Jacques Parizeau was declaring that money and "the ethnics" had cost him his nationalist dream, I had been vindicated. Why? Because a majority of Quebecers had again opted for Canada. We opted to remain part of the cosmopolitan, progressive, multilingual, and multicultural country that it is. We collectively understood that our strength comes from working together.
I am unabashedly Canadian. I am also fiercely proud to be a Quebecer. When my studies and my work took me outside the province, I kept up my French if not my health by regularly visiting the now-famous Pierre's Poutine in Guelph, and I never considered Quebec to be anything but my home.
A few years ago, when the opportunity arose to return to Quebec, I packed up my things and went for it. Why? Because an opportunity to come back was an opportunity to take an active part in the betterment of my home province.
Leaving Quebec out of spite accomplishes nothing to help your neighbours and your community. If you want Quebec to live up to its potential, as I do, then you must be an active part of its future, not only a critic of its past.
It is my hope that Kesselman and others like him will take the education and experience they gather in the rest of the world and eventually come home to work and help build the community that raised them.
words - Posted at 16:27 on
July 01, 2013
For the last several years, the Fondation Médical, based in Ste-Agathe, has held a dragon-boat race fundraiser sponsored by the town of St-Adolphe, with an entry fee of $2,000 per boat. We had 14 teams this year, raising more than $28,000. The English Communities Committee of the CSSS des Sommets organizes a boat each year under the team name "têtes-carrées", or "square-heads", and our boat raised the most money for a single boat (nearly $4,000).
While most teams have t-shirts, this year we opted for dollar-store animal hats. On hearing this, I said that is a great idea -- as long as I don't get the donkey.
While a child of the Laurentians whose first canoe trips were in diapers, it was my first time in a dragon boat. On Friday night, we met our teammates, some of whom I'd never met before, trained on the dock a bit and then were given one hour of training in the open water. After learning how to pace our stroke, avoid collision with each other, synchronise, and survive the 200-metre heat, we declared ourselves as ready as we were going to be.
Saturday was the big race day. We gathered under an unanchored tent cover, set up our food coolers, and my mother broke out the bag of hats identifying our team. I reached in and pulled out the donkey. The day was off to a good start.
I quietly traded my ass hat in for a shark, after rejecting the butterfly, and we prepared for our first heat. With at least 6 members of the 21-person crew joining the team on the day-of rather than at training, we met our event-assigned boatswain and paddled off to a bay for some additional training. After paddling in circles and drilling for 15 minutes or so we went up to the start line, and came in third out of three boats in the heat, only one second off the leader. Good start!
With 14 teams sharing 3 boats, our second heat wasn't going to be for a while, and so we had lunch, mingled, and waited for our names to be called again.
Around 1:15pm we were called out to our second of three heats, where we came in a tight second place, and headed back to our tent, which had by now been bolted to the ground by St-Adolphe's public works after strong wind had displaced it several feet and knocked over others altogether. We gathered around and were just about to be briefed by our captain and coach Vickie Barrett on strategy for our third heat when our names came over the loudspeaker and we rushed back to the boat, sans briefing and unprepared.
We each grabbed a paddle and lifejacket, hopped in the boat still tired from the previous heat, paddled over to the starting line, heard the air horn, and promptly won the heat by a full boat length.
In a fundraiser for something as important as the Fondation Médicale, everyone wins. With a little extra practice for the square heads, I am definitely looking forward to paddling again next year.
words - Posted at 23:13 on
June 16, 2013
Beno Albert Eskenazi
As several relatives have asked for the text of my eulogy for Grandpa's funeral this past February, I am posting it here for the record.
Family... friends... engineers... fellow survivors of the Spanish Inquisition,
I want to take just a couple of minutes together to celebrate the life of my grandfather.
I will not dwell on the past few years as his body slowly let his ever-sharp mind down to the point where his only true remaining daily pleasure was eating, but instead celebrate the impressive previous 80-something years that brought him to that point, and are what really brought us here together
English, as you might know, was not my grandfather's first language, although you would not necessarily know it from speaking to him. It was his fifth, following Ladino, Turkish, Greek, and French. He was born a Sephardic Jew, descendent of exiles of the Spanish Inquisition in the predominantly Islamic city of Istanbul, then with a population of around half a million people and a documented history going back well over two thousand years.
Recognising my grandfather's Turkish heritage means that his story can not be complete without at least one reference to Nasreddin Hodja, but there is no time to tell one right now. This is a Jewish funeral and we are on a clock, so those of you who know which Hodja story I was to tell, please tell those of you who do not.
He came to Canada in the 1940s and by 1949, a young and recently married engineering Master's student at McGill released his thesis, entitled "Behaviour of a Composite Slab for a Highway Bridge" starting a long and distinguished career as an engineer here in Montreal. Fifty years later, in 1999, he edited an English-to-Ladino-to-English Sephardic folk dictionary representing his strong passion for the cultural roots of our family, dating back to 15th century Spain. Through to his final years, anyone addressing him in Spanish or Ladino would greatly animate him.
As I was born after his retirement, I never saw grandpa use a slide rule. I am told he was the "fastest slide ruler in Montreal", coaxed to an early retirement by the perhaps not entirely coincidental simultaneous arrival of both the digital calculator and my brother.
About a decade ago, I bought my first house. My grandparents came to visit me there the summer after I bought it and, immediately, grandpa homed in on the fact that the stairway up from the back yard onto this wood deck was parallel to, and beyond, the final joist. With great concern that this old structure was in imminent danger of structural failure, he insisted that I immediately order 12 foot long two-by-eights to reinforce it. When he returned home a couple of days later, he phoned me to let me know that he had thought long and hard about it, and it was, in fact, still ok the way it was and he hoped I had not yet ordered the wood. I did not tell him that I already had and was trying to figure out how on earth to insert it into the structure.
On another occasion, he visited the house built by my father's mother in Val-Morin. He declared that it would collapse and could not be saved. Sure enough, some time later, while selling it, my father and the architect observed that it was, indeed, collapsing.
Being an engineer, it seems, is something you are, not something you do.
His passion for his family and for his heritage were never shaken.
In 2001, we traveled together as a family to Turkey to see his siblings and relatives who remained there, and to show us where he grew up, the family cottage on the Island of Buyucada just off shore from Istanbul, the culture he left behind in a city that had grown more than 20-fold to 13 million people since his departure, for what he no doubt knew would be his last visit.
On arrival at Ataturk Airport in Istanbul, we were taken over to the bag search area by a customs officer. Grandpa, not taking kindly to this, declared, in Turkish "we are Canadian!" We were waved along with an apologetic shrug, our bags unopened.
He would always watch out for us, probably more times and in more ways than any of us will ever know.
And he would indulge us. Growing up, I loved ships, trains, planes, and biking, not that any of those things have really changed. I was fascinated by transportation systems. My grandparents could entertain me indefinitely by simply leaving me on my own in the den of their Nun's Island apartment, watching both the trains cross the Victoria Bridge and CPAC, the direct feed to Canada's parliament on television. But as someone who had helped design a good amount of infrastructure, he was more than happy to oblige my interests, making sure that we crossed all the bridges over the St. Lawrence in Montreal together, biking along the seaway from the Victoria bridge for miles up river, or on Nun's Island's endless bicycle trails on his tandem. He would even stop and wait for a train to pass us behind if I saw headlights coming at a railway crossing and wanted to watch, which no doubt conflicted with his get-there attitude.
I asked grandpa once many years ago: did you ever design a railway bridge? Yes, he told me, his first-ever professional engineering assignment was to design a small industrial railway overpass. But he designed it for train cars with only two axles, one at each end. Canadian railway cars are longer and always have four (or more) axles, not two, resulting in an argument with his boss as he had never seen a train car with four axles, and his boss had never seen one with only two.
In Florida, where my grandparents had a house at Emerald Lakes in Port Salerno, I remember being taken to the restaurant at one of the nearby airfields, or near sea channels, watching draw bridges open for boats to pass through, and how he confidently left me to bicycle to the nearby railway line, where I would spend hours on end expectantly watching the tracks rust. I felt proud of his confidence that I would stay cautiously back from the tracks, learning only in adulthood that the trains through that area in fact operated almost exclusively at night.
I have vague memories of my grandfather owning a boat in Florida. I recall being told to be quiet in the boat so that the "alligators wouldn't hear us". Nicely done, grandpa.
When I was probably 10 or 11 years old, he tried to explain to me where his stock portfolio was stored on his computer, before I had any real understanding of what either a stock portfolio, or a computer, was. He wanted me to know so I could help the family find it should he suddenly pass on. I was just as happy playing 'bricks', a three-dimensional tetris-like game he loved. But ensuring I knew this information was, as much as anything, part of an attitude he taught his family. He liked to spend money, sure, but he also liked to save it, and understood implicitly that the amount of money you have has far more to do with how little of it you spend than how much of it you make. But all the caution in the world would never permit him to spare a dime in providing for his family.
He had the most beautiful smile in the whole family. Her name was Goldie. Her, his three kids, his three kids-in-law, his five grand children, and his two great grand-children were the most important people in the world to him.
Just a few years ago, grandpa told me and Jonah in no uncertain terms that he expected great grand children in the near future and that it was our duty to provide them.
How many people were in his family didn't really matter. That they were his family did, and knowing that his family continued gave him the satisfaction of knowing that he had succeeded at life. Acutely aware of his heritage, his priority was always continuing it.
My grandfather was a very predictable, and, not always intentionally, a very funny man. In his final weeks, he told my mother "I don't want to be so logical any more," certainly a highly accurate self-assessment. The very last thing he ever said to me, just a few days ago, was "give me another chocolate!"
One can only imagine my grandfather's last thought.
words - Posted at 10:42 on
April 29, 2013
The challenges we face
I would like to try and put the challenges we face into some perspective. These are the challenges we will face as a Party and as a team between now and the next election, that you and I as the grassroots will have to tackle as fullsomely as our next leader. The Conservative party out-fundraises the combined efforts of all four opposition parties. Their considerable warchest grows by the day while we argue about who should be our president and how we should select our leader.
Challenges from the majority Conservative government
The current Prime Minister used to head a group called the National Citizens' Coalition whose founding principle was the abolition of universal healthcare. It goes without saying that, from a government that has already abolished the Access to Information Registry without announcing it, discreet, barely-noticeable changes to healthcare are likely to be made, cumulatively endangering the programme at the very core of our Canadian identity.
Moreover, I rather suspect the Conservatives will spend the first year carefully governing from the centre to create the narrative that there is no "hidden agenda" and that the party is not extreme, spend the second year implementing a series of far right wing policies while nobody is paying attention and the gentle, centrist Harper image has ingrained itself in the Canadian psyche, and spend the final years of its mandate returning to the kind, gentle centrist Conservatives allowing enough time for anyone who noticed the changes to forget about them.
The Conservatives are now in complete control of the Canada Elections Act, a danger that cannot be overstated. The Conservative Party, in majority power for the first time ever, not to be confused with the Party of John A. MacDonald or Joe Clark, has already demonstrated a willingness to play with our election rules. The implementation of fixed election dates except in cases where the government should fall early was already a principle enshrined in our constitution: an election must take place within five years of the previous, a term limit that the new law has shortened by as little as two months and two weeks in the worst case.
There are several areas of this Act and related laws that we can expect this government to modify.
Fixed election dates
As noted above, the Conservatives brought in a relatively meaningless fixed election date law shortly after coming to power. The first election to come from it would have taken place in October, 2010, just 7 months ago, but, without losing the confidence of the House but faced with a looming massive recession that not everyone had yet picked up on, the Conservatives pulled the plug two years early, giving us a general election on October 14, 2008 in complete disregard for their own law. In the new Parliament, the election law whose stated intention is to cap parliamentary terms at 4 years will actually prolong this Parliament by 5 months, 2 weeks, and 3 days beyond the 4 year mark, landing within a week of the October, 2015 Ontario provincial election, also riding on a fixed election date law. With these factors it is reasonable to believe that the Harper Conservatives will pull the plug in a surprise snap election as much as a year early if there is political advantage to be gained from it.
Of particular concern is the Conservative Party's inability to balance a budget. With the substantial accomplishment of putting us into deficit before the recession hit, we can expect debt to hit 100% of GDP by the end of Harper's first term in office and a rapidly spiraling inflation rate as we try to deal with it. Seeing that around the corner and facing untried leaders in as many as all of the opposition parties is likely to provide the needed impetus to call that early election.
We already know they intend to get rid of per-vote funding. But you'll note that they don't phrase it that way; they say that parties should not receive public financing. Simply put, there are a lot more sources of public financing for parties than just the per-vote funding. 60% of campaign expenses are reimbursed by Elections Canada after they have reviewed the official returns from each local and national campaign. This is what allows us to fight a $21 million election with $10 million and a great big loan. The per-vote funding and the 60% rebate are just Elections Canada's contributions to parties. Revenue Canada also subsidises parties by allowing non-refundable tax credits of up to 75% of donations, far higher than the tax reductions allowed for charitable donations. You can bet that all of these sources of funding are in jeopardy.
Riding boundaries and counts
Following the census that you have all by now received in your mailbox, Elections Canada will begin the process of redrawing riding boundaries across the country to make way for dozens of new ridings in a decannual process called redistribution, intended to keep roughly one riding per 100,000 Canadians. The Conservatives have been trying to push through a law for a few years to gerrymander this allocation by giving 10 seats to Ontario, 7 to BC, and 5 to Alberta instead of simply letting Elections Canada do its work. Complaints from Quebec have so far kept this custom modification of representation from being rammed through on the rather hollow argument that their population isn't growing as fast as the rest of the country and therefore their representation would be negatively affected. Of greatest concern here is that the Conservative government may interfere with the process of drawing those boundaries to create demographically favourable ridings. American congressional districts are drawn by both the Republican and Democratic parties in this manner, creating vast areas of seats that are very difficult to swing as they are shaped around absorbing communities of likely supporters.
Now with a substantial majority of Conservatives, the party's urgency in reforming the senate has waned somewhat, however implementing some form of Senate elections or reform is something that party has talked about for many years and is something we can expect. Implementing Senatorial elections is, among other things, another way that the Conservatives can financially squeeze opposition parties who will have another front to fight on with the limited resources available. It is more likely because of this than any genuine desire to see a reformed Senate that changes would be brought in during this mandate.
Challenges from within our own party
Money and members
During this past election, the party expressed genuine surprise at receiving an unprecedented record four million dollars in donations to pay for its $21 million campaign. Vast numbers of people we did not know would give to our party were coming out of the woodwork and sending us cheques. Why didn't we know? Who were they? What can we learn from them to find out who else is teetering on the very edge of opening their wallets to the Liberal Party?
This represents one of the great advantages and opportunities that we have but are not effectively using for a variety of reasons. Liberalist, the database of and for the ground organisation of the party, contains the capability of microtargetting our support down to that person who will give us the maximum donation this year if only, for example, our MPs consistently wore red ties. We can glean from this database things like everyone in the country who took a lawn sign or volunteered this past election, at least from ridings that kept that information in the database and not in a spreadsheet (or at all). Those are people ripe for party membership and donations; they have already identified themselves as partisan Liberals in an election where being Liberal was not exactly the In Thing. We have many activist codes in Liberalist for a wide variety of issues and, at the riding and national level, we need to be targeting those people to get involved to pursue their issues; by contacting us they have already told us they want to be more politically engaged than they are.
But the fundraising database is not Liberalist. That department of the national office uses its own database with its own information on members, its own histories, its own systems, sharing bits and pieces of it with Liberalist to populate activist codes and a few other fields. Membership, too, uses still another database, also sharing information with Liberalist in regular data dumps giving us on the ground the appearance of cohesion. While many organisations have many more divergent databases, we have the capability of consolidating onto one system and eliminating duplication (and contradiction) of effort and information and it will require real leadership and investment within the party structure to make those changes so we can concentrate on the greater challenges of working as one cohesive team.
The Party focuses a lot of effort on raising money for the Party, but not so much for its riding associations which are largely left to their own devices. Being a member of the Laurier Club gets you free admission to national conventions and invitations to the occasional event, but to be a Laurier member you need only give to the national party, ridings be damned. Other than the Victory Fund, which obligates donations at both levels, there is very little incentive or encouragement from the national party to financially support riding associations.
It is not necessarily important for each person to give both time and money. While both are very important, the value of donated time cannot be overstated. We currently do not have a strong timeraising strategy, nor are our vast numbers of committed volunteers well acknowledged.
Not every riding has a strong ground game for the party. Some ridings are fiscally quite weak. With the above-mentioned challenge of redistribution, we will have to recruit even more people to be riding presidents and executives, campaign managers and volunteers, and search for ever more qualified candidates.
This, the preparation of the ground game, is the most fundamental problem we each have to address. We don't need to care who the president of the party is for this, we simply have to work on building a team to raise money and knock on every door and call every phone number in each and every riding. We have to find those volunteers, candidates, and donors that will allow us to fight the next election. This is something done by you, by me, by our friends, our neighbours, our families, our colleagues. It is not something brought down from the Party or that anyone will do for us. That, fundamentally, is what it means to be the grassroots.
Policy is not our greatest challenge. We have myriad excellent policies and a long track record of implementing them. Those that want an effect on policy should get involved in the organisation and make a difference on the ground. That, more than anything else, is the best way to be in a position to change policy in this country. All the best policy in the world will never get implemented by the third party in a majority-led parliament.
There is a pervasive problem in politics of all stripes, and indeed in many corporate and social environments, of analysing newcomers not in how they might contribute to the organisation's function and success, but in how they are a threat to the positions of those already established. It is an attitude that we must consciously shake out at all levels to ensure the strength and growth of this Party. Riding associations, PTAs, and the National Office must each look at every person coming in in terms of their abilities and their contributions, not in terms of whose jobs or roles they endanger or how their experiences and ideas might disrupt the existing systems, regardless of how flawed those systems might be.
The Party desperately needs to shake its image as a top-down party that believes itself entitled to power. We are not entitled to any single seat in the House of Commons or even in the Senate, we have to earn each one by offering something to Canadians that they want, not by telling them that they should have it because it is good for them. We need to rebuild a strong, grassroots party and put a leader there whose focus will be on selling this Party and its principled ideas and modest just-like-you base to his or her fellow Canadians, and we need a leader who is answerable to the Party and understands that their role is to sell and promote the Party, but not to be the Party. That leader needs to be someone young enough to be around for at least two, preferably three elections, who can survive as leader in the face of a defeat at the first attempt. In other words, the next leader needs to be able to be leader for at least the next 10-15 years so we must choose carefully, slowly, and deliberately.
Challenges from other parties
The New Democratic Party will spend the next four years doing two things. The first will be extensive experiments with different sizes and shapes of muzzles to keep the new, politically inexperienced caucus out of trouble, and the second will be attempting to complete the rebrand of itself as a centre-left Government in Waiting, in an effort to moot any perceived need for a centrist Liberal Party. The NDP itself faces many challenges, not least of which is Layton's longevity. He has already been leader for eight years and his health simply won't allow him to be there forever. It goes without saying that Thomas Mulcair will be the favourite for the next leadership, but with the nature of the dispute between him and Jean Charest still a secret and his ability to talk himself into a hole, we could be surprised by a more charismatic, serious, and less error-prone leader rising to the top of the party.
Elizabeth May has her seat, knocking Conservative minister Gary Lunn out of his Saanich-Gulf Islands riding in a decisive victory. This will ensure that May will be seen and heard from a lot more over the next four years and she will almost certainly be in the next round of televised debates. Her party did not have a huge effect on the 2011 election because it focused all its resources on the singular objective of getting that one seat, but it will be back in 2015 and, if they play their cards right over the next four years, will be a considerable force on the campaign trail that year.
The Bloc Quebecois and national unity
The Bloc did not win zero seats; they won four and are therefore still in Parliament. You can bet your behind that the separatist element of the party is not going to let it die completely. Between now and the 2015 election, Jean Charest's Quebec Liberal government is up for re-election and, while Charest is an exceptional campaigner, current predictions are that the province will hold its nose and put Pauline Marois in as premier. The threat here is a lot bigger than Bloc seats, it is a rise of separatism and the inane belief by many in the Conservatives, the NDP, and even some in our own party that placating the separatists will somehow lead to a stronger Canada and an end to Quebec nationalism, as if Meech Lake and Charlottetown never happened. With the government and official opposition parties both interested in decentralist policies and negotiating with Quebec, the flames of Quebec nationalism will almost certainly be fanned over the next four years and all of this together could be good news for the Bloc.
That's my one-hour pre-breakfast summary of what we are facing. Let us stop worrying about who should be the leader or the president of the party or what kind of electoral system the Conservatives should (but won't) implement and focus on the greater challenges that we have and that we can have an effect on immediately. We need to prepare for a long, difficult road ahead and we need to stop pretending that we lost this election because of any factors that didn't have something to do with us, because if we do not acknowledge our weaknesses, we will never fix them.
This is a challenge, and it is one that we can and will rise to.
words - Posted at 09:10 on
May 10, 2011
On the future of the Liberal Party
Following a painfully slow seven year implosion, the Liberal Party of Canada has a lot of introspective reflection ahead.
My friends Joseph Angolano and Jason Cherniak have posted intelligent, thoughtful notes on the future of the Liberal party and what this election means for us and how to go about the future, and I agree wholeheartedly with both. As they have accurately noted, none of us can presume to have all the answers, but we can all start making a sincere effort to ask the right questions.
Jason's note: https://www.facebook.com/notes/jason-cherniak/10-proposals-for-liberals/10150167009455047
Joseph's note: https://www.facebook.com/notes/joseph-angolano/what-happened-and-what-to-do-next/10150178297794438
For me, the question is not should we merge with the NDP, the Greens, or both, nor is it who will be our next Messiah (nor again is it whether we should change our electoral system, the red herring a third-place NDP chased for years). While I have my opinions on who would -- and who would not -- make a good leader, focusing on that is a distraction from the greater challenge of engaging our own grassroots and core supporters.
We have 34 MPs left, most of which won in spite of, not because of, being in this party. They are people who understand local profile and local engagement, who understand the old adage that "all politics is local" and that a population would rather vote for someone they feel that they know than someone they have heard of and seen on television, but the person on television is a strong second choice if nobody is there to engage them at their doorstep. They are people who understand that, to the average voter, getting their mother's immigration status sorted or their unemployment insurance out of logjam is more important than what kind of plane our air force flies or how some other politician lied to who about what.
It is a lesson that many rookie MPs will learn the hard way next election. The many MPs who were nothing more than names on ballots, who couldn't find their own riding on a map, who in some cases don't even speak the language of their constituents, will not be able to engage their constituencies and build a local profile as anything more than a laughing stock. We mustn't forget the lessons of the ADQ whose ascension on the profile of a single person and collapse on the reality of his followers resulted in the party's utter demise after a brief moment as Quebec's Official Opposition, the same voters of which are responsible for the NDP's current moment in the sun.
But we must heed those lessons ourselves, as well. Nobody wants a high profile candidate who is too good to deal with their EI case, and nobody is served by a candidate whose campaign strategy is to ride the coattails of a successful national campaign. In politics, every one of us is here to serve others ahead of ourselves and those who lose sight of that may succeed in the short term, but are inevitably doomed to catastrophic failure in the long term.
So where do we go from here?
The party's per-vote funding could be gone outright before the next cheque is cut, and I would be surprised if this election is not the last in which the bulk of our expenses are reimbursed by Elections Canada following our official returns. The party has significant debt, a large, freshly renovated national office and many provincial offices, and an awful lot of freshly unemployed talent from the offices of more than 40 MPs as well as the office of the leader of the official opposition. Our research funding from parliament will be reduced considerably, and every aspect of the party's staff structure will be cut back. It is an opportunity to ensure that the party is staffed by the best, brightest, and most selfless people available while we focus on rebuilding the party from the bottom up and give it new direction.
Now is not the time to give up on the party. It is time for the grassroots of the party to heed one of the most important and often-forgotten lessons there is: we are not members of the party, we are the party. There is no sense in saying what the party can or should do, because every time we do that, we shirk our own responsibility and accept the judgment, action, and decisions of others, and when they are wrong, we wear it. Now is the time to make sure your membership is paid up and you are a member of your riding association so that wholesale takeovers of associations, snap nomination meetings, and other undemocratic processes cannot take place. But there is more to it than that. Each and every one of us has a responsibility to recruit members and raise money for our riding associations because it is there that the real action happens as our surviving MPs can tell you. A well-funded riding association can fight an election, hold community events for people who are not partisans, and be active between elections, raising its own profile and that of its candidate, who should always be carefully chosen even in the most strongly held ridings of another party. And we need to nominate those candidates before we choose the leader, so that we know they are there for the right reasons and have time to build their profiles and relationships with the communities.
We will need a new leader, that is beyond a shadow of a doubt, and that will mean a leadership race. Some of the candidates from the last race are still paying off their debts from it. It will be integral to the success of the next race that no candidate be permitted to go into any debt whatsoever, relying on pay-as-you-go donations, and I would hope that there is no leadership vote until well in 2012; let us take our time and do it right.
Inspiring and engaging the grassroots of the party is critical. A negative leadership race based on an anybody-but campaign will secure our place as the third party for a generation and any candidate who risks causing a divisive campaign must weigh that into their decision. We will each need to get behind a candidate and push them forward as a positive choice for our party and for our country rather than burying our opponents as a negative option or a source of division and split, because that is the same strategy we will need to present to Canadians for their decision of October 19, 2015.
In the meantime, the most important thing for each and every one of us is to ask ourselves not what will the party do for me, for itself, or even for the country in its current state; it is: what can we do for the cause and growth of the Party, for the Party is each and every one of us, and only if we succeed there is the party's role in the country going to become a question once again.
words - Posted at 09:24 on
May 04, 2011
On the point of facebook
Originally posted as a facebook note in response to one by my friend Mike
The question of what a 'facebook friend' really is, and how facebook can serve as a tool is an important one that every person has to answer for themselves. This is my perspective and I hope you consider it through the lens of your own understanding and needs as you consider whether or not facebook is a tool for you in your life and your career. Because of the limitations of comments on having a wholesome discussion, I feel I must respond to you in this format. So here is my response, point by point.
okay, so let's say it's a tool, got it. HOW do I utilize it? I am hung up on the term "friend". I have facebook "friends" that I'm not sure I can call friends in real life. I have an anurism over that. I have unfriended people I've gone to school with because I'm not sure if we were friends or would see each other enough (at all?) to warrant the term friend.
Try not to think of facebook friends in terms of friends you'd call up to go hang out with in ten minutes because you're bored out of your wits. LinkedIn calls the same concept "connections" and I think this is a much more apt and appropriate term than "friends". Now that you've got the concept down that friends is simply a misnomer and that the people you are linked to on facebook are connections, let's look at your initial question: how do you utilise it?
That depends on your objective. For me, in spite of my social awkwardness (hi! spot the computer geek!) I love meeting people, learning about them, seeing the world through their eyes, and networking. Networking, to me, is staying in touch with everyone I've ever had anything to do with in case either of us ever does something useful or interesting to the other. For example, I recently reconnected on facebook with an acquaintance from high school who I knew only insofar as we were in the same class year, because I found out at our 10-year reunion a year ago that she does fascinating work with carbon credit markets in DC. Now that I'm getting myself engaged in politics from a policy perspective more, her expertise could be useful to help me understand that whole field going forward and I can help her in getting that understanding to become more widespread. We've had each other on facebook for years.
Since arriving in Ottawa less than two months ago, I have been taking advantage of years of built-up facebook network connections to learn my way around the people and geography of this city. Without facebook, my integration into Ottawa life would have been months slower and very frustrating. Instead, using that network, I have very quickly gotten set up and established in this city and feel like I have been able to make the best possible use of my time and energy.
It is very unlikely that you and I would ever talk if we did not have each other on facebook. Are we close friends in real life? No, I think we've met three, maybe four times. And most of those are a direct result of facebook; I would not have come to your campaign event this summer if I did not hear about it on facebook, for example, and we certainly wouldn't be having this conversation if I'd gotten one of your facebook pink-slips. Similarly, I am using facebook to stay in touch with the people I left behind in Guelph or met through there in a way and to an extent I never would have been able to without this tool.
So what is your objective? Well, you've run for public office three times -- that I know of -- to date and have yet to win. Our mutual friend Cam has run just twice, and came to a resounding, clobbering victory on his second attempt. He's a strong candidate, public speaker, and so forth, but I don't think you can overestimate the value and power of his facebook connections. He has well over a thousand people on there he has met through various activities inside and outside of Guelph and he used facebook as a tool to reach out to those people for time, money, and electoral support on election day. His landslide results, I think, speak for themselves.
I've unfriended girls just because they're in a relationship meaning there'd be no romantic prospects me.
That you've "unfriended girls just because they're in a relationship meaning there'd be no romantic prospects" for you is a statement I think you should reread a few times and think about. Does that mean you are not capable of friendship with a girl unless there is the prospect of a relationship? Is that really healthy? I have and regularly talk to many females both on and off facebook and whether or not I could date them does not factor. They are my friends, acquaintances, and connections regardless of their current relationship status or of my potential to change it, notwithstanding my being 'in the market'.
I've unfacebookfriended people just because they have things on their profile (about their own lives and having nothing to do with me) that I wouldn't want someone "creep"ing my profile (let's come back to that term later)
Nobody expects anybody to follow everything from everybody on facebook. It is completely unrealistic to expect of yourself or your friends to keep up with all your connections' myriad facebook updates. But that said, if you want to know what someone is up to you haven't heard from in a while, talk to someone, plan to see someone, or anything of that nature, you can review their facebook profiles and satisfy your curiosity or assuage your concern. It is incumbent on each and every denizen of the internet to only share what they would be able to handle appearing on the front page of the New York Times in a tell-all story about them tomorrow or years down the road, but by no means a requirement or even a recommendation for you to stay on top of every mundane detail of every one of your connections' daily lives. At least for me, I share what I share on facebook in the moment. I don't particularly care if nobody reads it or everybody does. I enjoy the feedback on my recipes and I comment on, share, or 'like' a lot of posts that appear in my news feed but seldom will open a profile to see what someone is up to in more detail unless they say or do something that gets my curiosity going, or I haven't heard from them in ages and wonder what they're up to. "Why did they post that non sequitur status," for example, can often be answered by seeing other recent status messages or posts. Indeed this post is merely an expansion of comments on your wall.
to see because they saw person(s) X(Y) on my "friend" list (Think how the right-wing liked/likes to beat on Obama over Jeremiah Wright. Connection? yes. Involvement and/or endorsement of quote/action/etc.? NO) All of the above people are good people with whom I have no real quarrel. It's just I'm trying to define this thing and if some people fell out of that "facebook friend" definition (which is always changing?) I took them off the list. But despite that, how many people may I have upset because I "unfriended" them, on facebook? Even though that was not MY intent. It's awkward to talk about. It's changed how we talk. I was walking through some Fair displays/booths and one of the ladies operating one of them recognized me as a facebook friend, saying as such. "Okay, so if we're friends ON FACEBOOK, what are we in REAL LIFE?" (I didn't actually say that but I'm quoting my thought process) suffice it to say, she's not on the list anymore. But with no malice, it's just she didn't quite fit the definition of how I think/thought this thing is supposed to work.
In today's social environment, deleting someone on facebook is tantamount to telling them you never want to hear from them again, that your connection to them is not only no longer worth acknowledging, but that you explicitly want nothing to do with them ever again; it's taken as a slap in the face and without a doubt it will impact your off-line relationship.
Now, let's come back to "creep"ing. Our profiles are items for public consumption. Isn't a "friend request" an invite, in part, to follow our generated content (photos/statuses/etc.)? If an interest in all content isn't required then why are we generating it? In the beginning, I put a great onus on myself to see/read EVERYTHING of EVERYONE on my friend list. So, in sending (or accepting) I had it in my mind "is this someone I want to spend a LOT of time comsuming their content" David, you gotta figure that's WHY I kept my list so small for so long. Because that's probably a ridiculous standard to meet. Now time has gone on, I don't "creep" as hardcore, because it's just not practical. But, I don't "creep" to be creepy, I "creep" because I'm still figuring what's required of me as a facebook friend. David, I could go on and on and on and on. But believe me when I say, I don't think you know just how I've struggled with this thing.
I think facebook is an excellent networking tool. It tells the people on your friends' list that you care enough about each and every one of them to have them on your list of connections, and that you and they are available to each other as connections in a context appropriate to the two of you on an entirely case-by-case basis. As someone who has repeatedly sought public office, facebook is a tool whose value to you really cannot be overstated, and as a modern member of the connected generation, I think we all have everything to gain and nothing to lose by building our personal networks and all being there for each other and growing together. It is not about a rapid way of communicating only with your closest friends -- facebook is not the best tool for that to begin with; that is best done in person, by email, and by telephone -- but about expanding your network of connections, communicating with people for mutual interest or benefit, exchanging expertise, and simply staying in touch with people you might not otherwise be able to,
In short, facebook can be a very powerful tool, but as with any tool, it is only useful when treated as one.
At least, that's my take.
PS: David, based just solely on my ramblings, I'm feeling like I could write a trilogy. I do look forward to your rebuttal, though. Dare I say, MMP all over again?
I don't think this really compares with the rancorous debates we had over MMP, but you know I'm always up for a debate. :)
words - Posted at 21:17 on
November 21, 2010
I have left Guelph and resettled in my home province of Quebec... ish. From my new perch in Hull I can see the Library of Parliament across the river in Ottawa to one side and Gatineau's casino in the other. One of those I find quite interesting.
Naturally one of my first tasks in arriving here is figuring out the rail network in town and figuring out the transit system. But in Ottawa/Gatineau, the latter seems totally unnecessary, at least from where I am. It's a 25 minute walk to downtown Ottawa, even faster on a bike, so I guess I'll learn about the buses when it gets too cold... the rail, on the other hand, was more than a little bit of a shock and I'll get into it more later, but let's just say: new city, same old stupidity. Gatineau has ripped up the rail line through town just recently in order to put in a transitway. Makes sense, I guess, except that that rail line, on the other side of the river, is the same one used by the O-train. And if you keep following it, you'll intersect with the rest of the country's network rather quickly. Going the other way, the tracks go to Montebello, Lachute, and Montreal via Ste-Therese. Could that track have had some potential? Sure, but using the right of way for a transitway, at least, is not a total waste.
I have quite a bit of learning still to do to find my way around this town and if anyone wants to meet up here let me know! I'm on facebook and can be reached at the email address at the bottom of this page.
More to come, of course.
words - Posted at 15:27 on
October 18, 2010
Keeping Track - Lawn mowers: our most pampered and successful pets
If I wanted a carpet outside my house, I would put down a carpet instead of a lawn. I've always had trouble with the concept of exceedingly short grass and wonder what the purpose is. There are plenty of plants that stay short on their own, are prettier and less allergenic than grass, require no mowing, and in some cases even produce perfectly good food. Wild strawberries, for example, are aggressive, short, and produce absolute delicious food. Creeping Charlie is considered a weed, but is anything but. It has all the advantages of grass with none of the disadvantages. But instead of these practical solutions to having carpets outside of our homes, we grow lawns, and my column this month is a nod to the most successful domestic species in the world: the lawn mower.
As a society, we're too good to our lawn mowers
Summer is once again upon us. I can tell, not because of the date, nor the sweet sound of chirping birds, nor even the flowers in bloom. Summer's arrival is heralded by the ubiquitous sound of grazing lawn mowers.
The noisiest and least social animal humans have domesticated, the lawn mower generates some of the world's most toxic flatulence while producing no useful byproducts.
Unlike many of its grazing ancestors, this survivor of the modern urban jungle has evolved to chew grass, and return it from whence it came.
It produces only foul smelling gases, yet it is one of the most popular pets known to humanity. Its ancestors on our lawns, the goat and the cow, produced milk used for many aspects of cooking and baking, as well as large quantities of fresh, healthy meat, but were seen as unsightly and messy because of the organic fertilizer they produced. In some areas, another popular grazing animal, the sheep, has been replaced by lawn mowers as growing wool for clothing has gone out of style.
Some older, endangered breeds of lawn mower chew up the lawn and spit it out, allowing the grass to decompose back into the soil and strengthen the lawns, but most modern species of lawn mower hold their meals in large stomachs that have to be emptied by their human masters when they get full.
Many people are so embarrassed by the digested remains of their lawn mower's meals that they hurriedly stoop and scoop the partially eaten grass, quickly hiding it in yard waste bags to be fed to the mower's distant cousin, the garbage truck.
As lawn mowers are known to have a voracious appetite, many of their masters feel compelled to chemically induce their lawns to produce more and, particularly in droughts, divert limited potable water to their lawns lest their lawn mowers become malnourished. Watering lawns is not always legal but many lawn mower owners do it at night, or have their children play with the sprinkler system.
While some citizens let their lawns languish in this dry weather, many people believe that this results in inhumane treatment of lawn mowers which must be fed at least once every two weeks to stay properly fit.
Some rare species of lawn mower are so difficult to feed, municipal governments set up entire parks just to provide enough for them to eat.
These heavy but nimble lawn mowers waste little time enjoying their meals, and spend much of the year trying to eat as much of each city's grass supply as its minders will allow, the better to prepare for their long winter hibernation.
The very best lawns are set aside for the elite. Their life of privilege is funded by generous people who care deeply about the health of these grazers; pampered fairways are subject to continual inspection by club-carrying foursomes, assuring the quality of the grass. On these large, exclusive properties, delicacies, known as greens, are cultivated to the finest tastes of the most demanding lawnmowers.
Lawn mowers are not a social species. They are solitary creatures, rarely ever seen in packs. This far north, they have evolved to hibernate for the winter, although in warmer climates they must be fed year-round.
Lawn mowers reproduce asexually, frequently speciating, and not inheriting evolutionary advances found among their peers.
They are known to react very aggressively to being petted, particularly on their underbellies. However, as lawn mowers are one of our most sacred species, it is very rare for them to be put down for such an outburst. Most lawn mowers are vegetarians, but they have been known to eat a wide variety of small amphibious and land animals that seek shelter in lawns.
Most cities have laws that effectively set minimum standards for the number of lawn mowers that must exist within its limits. If a lawn mower has not had access to a particular lawn in so long that the lawn's height exceeds eight inches, a landowner can be severely penalized for lack of compassion for their lawn mower. As a result, population control for lawn mowers is very difficult and in many areas their numbers have grown to exceed both dogs and cats.
Some people are beginning to see this prolific species as a pest.
With no natural predators, their numbers are increasing and some desperate groups are proposing reintroducing endangered residential grazers like goats.
Prolific consumers of grass and weeds, they could displace lawn mowers in the same habitat. These grazers would reproduce naturally and provide humans with an indirect means of eating their own lawns; feed a goat for the summer, and it will help feed your family for the winter.
The future of the lawn mower is looking very bright. As its world population continues to rise and farmland is replaced with lawn mower grazing fields freshly established in each new urban development, and as grasslands continue to expand northward as lawn mower flatulence works its way through the atmosphere, its food supply and habitat is growing by leaps and bounds.
Indeed, lawn mowers may be one of few species in the world to benefit and thrive from climate change.
words - Posted at 08:31 on
June 10, 2010
(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2006-2014 David Graham <firstname.lastname@example.org>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.